728_header.jpg (23748 bytes)
Google  Web AuctionBytes  

Home
Subscribe
Blog
Podcasts
Forums
AuctionBytes TV
ABU Back Issues

Sponsor

COOL TOOLS

Calendar
eBay Fee Calculator
Collectors' Links
eBay Promo History
Bookshelf
Fraud Resources
Auction Site Fees
Auction Management
Payment Services
Storefronts Chart
Sniping Chart
Email List Hosting
Consignment Services
Drop-Off Store Laws
Ecommerce Resources
Photo Tips
Marketing Inserts
Yellow Pages
Classifieds

AUCTIONBYTES

Our Writers
Write For Us
Partners
Press
Advertising
About Us
Link To Us

Auctionbytes-NewsFlash, Number 784 - June 17, 2004 - ISSN 1539-5065      | Next Story

eBay Petitions USPTO to Reexamine MercExchange Patents
By Ina Steiner
AuctionBytes.com
June 17, 2004
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

eBay petitioned the U.S. Patent & Trademark Office to reexamine MercExchange patents, and on June 4, 2004, the Patent office ordered a reexamination. The patents cover consignment fixed-price and software search agent technology.

A federal jury had found eBay guilty of infringing those patents last year, and eBay was ordered to pay MercExchange $29.5 million in damages. eBay is currently appealing the case.

MercExchange's president Tom Woolston said eBay has committed serious fraud by submitting perjurous evidence to the Patent office in its reexamination petition.

Practicing patent attorney Kevin Buford said reexaminations of patents is not unusual. Buford, a partner at Holland & Knight law firm, said there could be several outcomes in a patent reexamination, including narrowing the claims of the patent. If the Patent office rewords the patent and there is a material narrowing of the claim, eBay could cite the intervening rights doctrine and ask the court to forgo the judgement against it in the MercExchange lawsuit.

US Patent & Trademark spokesperson Brigid Quinn said statistically, 30% of the time all claims have been confirmed in third-party reexamination requests; 12% of the time all claims have been cancelled; and 58% of the time one or more of the claims are changed. "That means they have to be narrowed or eliminated, they cannot be broadened in reexam," Quinn said. The statistics are cumulative from 1981 through March of this year and apply to third party reexamination requests.

Buford and Quinn agreed that the Patent office does not consider court cases in making a determination in a patent reexamination. And if the Patent office narrows the claims, Buford said, it's not a slam-dunk that the judge would go with an eBay appeal.

Woolston feels that eBay's petition filing is more of the same. "It's the same issues being re-litigated at the Patent office," he said. "It's a desperate act of a company that refuses to accept any responsibility for their platform users."

MercExchange issued a press release earlier this week announcing auction marketplace uBid had agreed to license its patents for Internet-based auctions.


Email this story to a friend.

| Next Story

Related Stories
  • AutoTrader Licenses Online Auction Patents from MercExchange - January 20, 2003, Issue #466
  • Judge Rules on Post-Trial Motions in eBay Patent Lawsuit - August 07, 2003, Issue #587
  • The eBay Patent Wars: Interview with MercExchange CEO Thomas Woolston - September 30, 2004, Issue #859
  • eBay Questions Jury Instructions During Patent Appeal Hearing - October 06, 2004, Issue #863
  • Court Rules on MercExchange v eBay Patent Case - March 16, 2005, Issue #975
  • USPTO Issues Action in eBay-Requested Re-Exam of MercExchange Patent - March 29, 2005, Issue #984
  • Bickering Continues in eBay Patent Case - March 30, 2005, Issue #985
  • eBay Asks Supreme Court to Hear Patent Case - May 13, 2005, Issue #1017
  • New Developments in eBay - MercExchange Patent Suit - September 28, 2005, Issue #1117
  • Lawrence Lessig Part of Amicus Brief in eBay Supreme Court Case - October 07, 2005, Issue #1124
  • The eBay Patent Wars: PESA Summit Skirmish - October 29, 2005, Issue #1140
  • The eBay Patent Wars: PESA Summit Skirmish - October 29, 2005, Issue #1139
  • Supreme Court to Hear eBay Patent Case over Injunction Ruling - November 28, 2005, Issue #1160
  • MercExchange Gets Funding before Facing eBay and Supreme Court - December 02, 2005, Issue #1164
  • eBay Patent Wars: Behind-the-Scenes Battles - December 21, 2005, Issue #1178
  • eBay Patent Wars: MercExchange Reaches Agreeement with Patent Office - December 23, 2005, Issue #1180
  • The eBay Patent Wars: U.S. Government Weighs In - March 10, 2006, Issue #1234
  • eBay Patent War: Best Case/Worst Case Scenarios - March 29, 2006, Issue #1247
  • eBay and MercExchange Have their Day in Court - March 29, 2006, Issue #1247
  • Supreme Court: No Injunction in eBay Case, Back to District Court - May 15, 2006, Issue #1279
  • eBay Patent Wars: Hearing Set for Friday - November 14, 2006, Issue #6
  • eBay Patent Wars: Judge Wonders about Design Workaround - December 29, 2006, Issue #1441
  • eBay Patent Hearing Set for June: Buy It Now at Issue - April 18, 2007, Issue #1519
  • eBay Patent Wars: MercExchange Likely to Appeal Injunction Ruling - July 30, 2007, Issue #1588
  • eBay Must Fork over Damages in MercExchange Patent Case - December 12, 2007, Issue #1683
  • eBay Formulating Appeals Strategy in MercExchange Patent Case - December 13, 2007, Issue #1684
  • eBay v MercExchange Patent War: It's Over - February 28, 2008, Issue #1737



  • Discuss this story in our forums.

    Ecommerce Podcasts

    Site Index
    Copyright 1999-2008. Steiner Associates LLC. All rights reserved