728_header.jpg (23748 bytes)
Google  Web AuctionBytes  

Home
Subscribe
Blog
EcommerceBytes
Podcasts
Forums
Merchant Directory
AuctionBytes TV
ABU Back Issues

Sponsor

COOL TOOLS

Calendar
eBay Fee Calculator
Collectors' Links
eBay Promo History
Bookshelf
Fraud Resources
Auction Site Fees
Auction Management
Payment Services
Storefronts Chart
Sniping Chart
Email List Hosting
Consignment Services
Drop-Off Store Laws
Ecommerce Resources
Photo Tips
Marketing Inserts
Yellow Pages
Classifieds

AUCTIONBYTES

Our Writers
Write For Us
Partners
Press
Advertising
About Us
Link To Us

Auctionbytes-NewsFlash, Number 1246 - March 28, 2006 - ISSN 1539-5065      | Next Story

eBay Patent War: High Tech, Double Standard?
By Ina Steiner
AuctionBytes.com
March 28, 2006
AddThis Social Bookmark Button

With some major patent cases going before the Supreme Court, including the recent RIM Blackberry case and the upcoming eBay case, the problem of patents are getting a lot of media attention. The battle lines are drawn in articles and editorials between big companies and innovators. Big companies in the high-tech industry say an inventor must practice her patent before she can prevent someone else from using it, otherwise, the inventor is a "patent troll." Small innovators say the only leverage they have in getting big companies (with enormous legal might) to license their patents is the ultimate threat of injunction.

But large Silicon Valley corporations may have figured out a plan to give themselves both protection from patent trolls and the right to "troll patents" themselves. It comes in the form of a company called Intellectual Ventures. Companies like eBay, Google, Microsoft, Intel and others have invested in the company, according to Newsweek (http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6479958/site/newsweek).

Intellectual Ventures acquires high-tech patents and files its own patents with the patent office. Anyone who invests in Intellectual Ventures can rest assured that those patents will not be used against them. But according to Newsweek, the company also plans to make money for investors, possibly by demanding licensing fees from its investors' rivals. (So it's no surprise Intellectual Ventures filed an amicus brief in the eBay case in support of MercExchange.)

It looks like Silicon Valley corporations want to have their cake - and eat it too.

http://www.intellectualventures.com


Email this story to a friend.

| Next Story

Related Stories
  • eBay Rival MercExchange Says Tools Support Google Base - January 18, 2006, Issue #1197
  • Supreme Court to Hear eBay Argument on March 29, 2006 - January 30, 2006, Issue #1205
  • eBay Patent Wars: Former AG Ashcroft to Lobby for eBay - March 20, 2006, Issue #1240
  • A Guide to eBay's Road to the Supreme Court - March 27, 2006, Issue #1245
  • eBay and MercExchange Wage Patent Battle with Media Statements - March 31, 2006, Issue #1248
  • Editorial: eBay Argues before the Supreme Court - April 02, 2006, Issue #164
  • Supreme Court: No Injunction in eBay Case, Back to District Court - May 15, 2006, Issue #1279
  • eBay, MercExchange Claim Victory over Supreme Court Ruling - May 16, 2006, Issue #1280
  • eBay Patent Case Remanded to District Court - July 10, 2006, Issue #1319
  • eBay Patent Wars: Hearing Set for Friday - November 14, 2006, Issue #6
  • eBay Patent War: Patents, Lies and Videotape - November 20, 2006, Issue #1414
  • eBay Patent Hearing Set for June: Buy It Now at Issue - April 18, 2007, Issue #1519



  • Discuss this story in our forums.

    Ecommerce Podcasts

    Site Index
    Copyright 1999-2008. Steiner Associates LLC. All rights reserved