728_header.jpg (23748 bytes)
Google  Web AuctionBytes  

Home
Subscribe
Blog
Letters to Editor
EcommerceBytes
Podcasts
Forums
Merchant Directory
PR Service  
AuctionBytes TV
ABU Back Issues

Sponsor

COOL TOOLS

Calendar
eBay Fee Calculator
Collectors' Links
eBay Promo History
Bookshelf
Fraud Resources
Auction Site Fees
Auction Management
Payment Services
Storefronts Chart
Sniping Chart
Email List Hosting
Consignment Services
Drop-Off Store Laws
Ecommerce Resources
Photo Tips
Marketing Inserts
Yellow Pages
Classifieds

AUCTIONBYTES

Our Writers
Write For Us
Partners
Press
Advertising
About Us
Link To Us

150ab1.jpg 150ab2.jpg 150ab3.jpg

Auctionbytes-NewsFlash, Number 1667 - November 19, 2007 - ISSN 1539-5065      | Next Story

eBay Feedback Survey Causes Seller Uproar
By Ina Steiner
AuctionBytes.com
November 19, 2007
Reading AuctionBytes: eBay Feedback Survey Causes Seller Uproar

eBay sellers were outraged at the idea that eBay might force them to leave positive feedback under certain circumstances. Discussion began heating up over the weekend after sellers reported having received a survey from eBay on the topic of feedback. eBay often conducts surveys, but a few users posted online that they believed the controversial question indicated eBay had already made a decision to change the feedback system.

eBay asked survey recipients, "As a buyer, how would you prefer to receive Feedback?" They were given a choice of three responses: "I want sellers to leave me Feedback rating and comments as they do today"; "When I have quickly paid for my item, sellers can only leave me positive Feedback"; and "When I have quickly paid for my items, eBay will automatically leave me positive Feedback."

Speculation was rife on the eBay boards. "What do you think the reasoning is for this survey?" asked one user. "To remove the sellers option to leave NEGs for a buyer just because they paid for a transaction? Thats what appears to be in the minds them from the looks of this survey."

A reader wrote to AuctionBytes after taking the survey. She said it was her policy to leave positive feedback for buyers who pay immediately, but said she did not want eBay to make that decision for her.

The etiquette of leaving feedback has been debated for years, such as the question of who should leave feedback first - buyer or seller - and when. Those who leave feedback first often feel their trading partner then has the upper hand and can wield the threat of negative feedback as a weapon unless their demands - reasonable or not - are satisfied.

On a thread in eBay's Feedback board unrelated to the survey, sellers discussed the challenges of leaving feedback upon receipt of payment. One seller posted that she delays leaving feedback due to buyers who file chargebacks after a transaction (http://forums.ebay.com/db2/thread.jspa?threadID=2000469603&tstart=0&mod=1195428634289).

Another seller posted that it was not fear of chargebacks that made her change her feedback policy, but rather, "it was buyers realizing they already had their positive feedback and using that against me that made me start leaving it last."

Sellers pointed out that the only way eBay would know if buyers had paid for their items was if the buyers used PayPal. eBay offers an "Immediate Payment" option on fixed-price listings that requires payment through PayPal before a listing will officially end. eBay has been increasing its incentives to buyers to use PayPal, including limiting buyer protection to PayPal-funded transactions. A guarantee of a positive feedback rating would be another powerful incentive to using eBay's own payment service.

eBay has made very few adjustments to its feedback system over the years because it is such an important - and controversial - aspect of trading on the site. But 6 months ago, eBay rolled out a major change called "Feedback 2.0" (http://www.auctionbytes.com/cab/abn/y07/m05/i02/s02). The new system allows buyers to leave detailed ratings for sellers (DSRs) anonymously.

Interestingly, users were able to take the recent Feedback survey multiple times, making it susceptible to rigging and bringing into question the usefulness of its results (http://survey.ebay.com/survey/ebay/eby07030/us).

Discussion about the Feedback survey on eBay Stores board:
http://forums.ebay.com/db2/thread.jspa?messageID=1010938940&forumID=21

Update 11/19/07: eBay provided a response to AuctionBytes' inquiry, see the AuctionBytes blog post at http://blog.auctionbytes.com for the update.

Email this story to a friend.


AddThis Social Bookmark Button
| Next Story

Related Stories
  • eBay to Roll out Feedback 2.0, Safe Payment Requirement - January 18, 2007, Issue #1455
  • eBay's 'Feedback 2.0' Revealed - January 23, 2007, Issue #1458
  • Feedback 2.0 coming to eBay.com in May - February 28, 2007, Issue #1484
  • eBay Members React to New Feedback 2.0 Rating System - March 07, 2007, Issue #1489
  • AuctionBytes Publishes Survey Results on eBay Feedback 2.0 - March 09, 2007, Issue #1491
  • eBay Rolling Out Feedback 2.0 Worldwide - April 26, 2007, Issue #1525
  • eBay Tweaks SMI and Talks Trust & Safety at Town Hall Meeting - May 01, 2007, Issue #1528
  • eBay Rolls out Feedback 2.0: Interview with Brian Burke - May 02, 2007, Issue #1529
  • eBay Tests New Search Technology, Delays Rollout of New Feedback - May 04, 2007, Issue #1531
  • Received Unfair eBay Feedback? Tell It to the Jury - October 31, 2007, Issue #1654
  • eBay Town Hall Meeting: More Changes to Feedback? - November 30, 2007, Issue #1675
  • ChannelAdvisor Launches DSRWatch for eBay Sellers - December 11, 2007, Issue #1682
  • eBay UK Disadvantages Sellers with Sub-Par Shipping Ratings - December 21, 2007, Issue #1690
  • eBay's Top Sellers Perform Poorly on Feedback 2.0 - January 02, 2008, Issue #1696



  • Discuss this story in our forums.

    Site Index
    Copyright 1999-2009. Steiner Associates LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.