728_header.jpg (23748 bytes)
Google  Web AuctionBytes  

Home
Subscribe
Blog
Letters to Editor
EcommerceBytes
Podcasts
Forums
Merchant Directory
PR Service  
AuctionBytes TV
ABU Back Issues

Sponsor

COOL TOOLS

Calendar
eBay Fee Calculator
Collectors' Links
eBay Promo History
Bookshelf
Fraud Resources
Auction Site Fees
Auction Management
Payment Services
Storefronts Chart
Sniping Chart
Email List Hosting
Consignment Services
Drop-Off Store Laws
Ecommerce Resources
Photo Tips
Marketing Inserts
Yellow Pages
Classifieds

AUCTIONBYTES

Our Writers
Write For Us
Partners
Press
Advertising
About Us
Link To Us

150ab1.jpg 150ab2.jpg 150ab3.jpg

Auctionbytes-NewsFlash, Number 2048 - May 25, 2009 - ISSN 1539-5065      Previous Story |

L'Oreal Issues Statement on eBay Trademark Infringement Case
By Ina Steiner
AuctionBytes.com
May 25, 2009
Reading AuctionBytes: L'Oreal Issues Statement on eBay Trademark Infringement Case

After eBay UK issued a statement on Friday reporting that the UK High Court had ruled in its favor in the L'Oreal counterfeiting case on all counts, L'Oreal issued a statement about the ruling. "In a decision passed today by the UK High Court of Justice, the court agreed with the view held from the outset by L'Oreal, that eBay could do more to prevent trade mark infringement and suggested 10 measures:

  • filter listings before they are posted on the Site;
  • use additional filters, including filters to detect listings of not-for-sale products and unboxed products
  • filter descriptions as well as titles;
  • require sellers to disclose their names and addresses when listing items;
  • impose additional restrictions on the volumes of high risk products, such as fragrances and cosmetics, that can be listed at any one time;
  • be more consistent in their policies, for example regarding sales of unboxed products;
  • adopt policies to combat types of infringement which are not presently addressed, and in particular the sale of non-European Economic Area (EEA) goods without the consent of the trade mark owners;
  • take greater account of negative feedback (from site users);
  • apply sanctions more rigorously;
  • be more rigorous in suspending accounts linked to those of users whose accounts have been suspended."

eBay said the High Court ruled in favor of eBay on all counts and has also referred a number of items to the European Court of Justice for clarification and confirmation. L'Oreal said the UK High Court of Justice considered that the relevant European trade mark law and the eCommerce Directive were unclear and referred nearly all the issues to the European Court of Justice (ECJ) for further guidance.

You may quote up to 200 words of any article on the condition that you attribute the article to AuctionBytes.com and either link to the original article or to www.AuctionBytes.com.
All other use is prohibited.
Email this story to a friend.


Previous Story |

Related Stories
  • eBay Expects New Motion in Antitrust Lawsuit - February 26, 2009, Issue #1986
  • eBay Antitrust Lawsuit Slogs On - March 23, 2009, Issue #2003
  • Skype Files Claim against Joltid Over License Agreement - April 02, 2009, Issue #2010
  • eBay Fends off L'Oreal's Counterfeiting Lawsuit - May 13, 2009, Issue #2040
  • eBay UK Scores Win in Counterfeiting Case - May 22, 2009, Issue #2047
  • Coach Launches 'Operation Turnlock' Anti-Counterfeit Campaign - May 22, 2009, Issue #2047
  • eBay and L'Oreal to Mediate in Counterfeiting Case - May 27, 2009, Issue #2050
  • Appeal Possible in eBay Discrimination Case - June 15, 2009, Issue #2058
  • eBay Responds to Appeals Hearing in Tiffany Case - July 17, 2009, Issue #2082
  • Antitrust Doc Alleges eBay Sought Alliances to Fend off Google - August 11, 2009, Issue #2099
  • eBay Says It's On-Track to Close Skype Deal Despite Lawsuit - September 17, 2009, Issue #2120
  • eBay and Craigslist Trial Postponed, Use Blogs for War of Words - October 05, 2009, Issue #2130



  • Discuss this story in our forums.

    Site Index
    Copyright 1999-2009. Steiner Associates LLC. All rights reserved. Privacy Policy.