728_header.jpg (23748 bytes)
 Home   EB Blog   AB Blog   Letters   Podcasts   ABTV   Forums   EPIS   PR Service   Classifieds   Ecommerce EKG   Service Ratings   
  Subscribe    RSS Feeds    Twitter        Contact Us  Web Site  
Service Ratings 
   Auction Sites
   FP Marketplaces
   Inventory Management
   Payment Services
   Storefronts & Carts
   Sniping Services
   Wholesale/Dropshipping
   Email List Hosting
   Consignment Services
   Ecommerce EKG 
   Auction Calendar
   Collectors' Links
   eBay Promo History
   Bookshelf
   Fraud Resources
   Drop-Off Store Laws
   ABTV
   Ecommerce Resources
   Photo Tips
   Marketing Inserts
   Yellow Pages
   Advertising

EcommerceBytes-NewsFlash, Number 2336 - July 29, 2010 - ISSN 1539-5065     Previous | | Next
Court to Set Aside Judgment against eBay in 'PayPal-only' Lawsuit
By Ina Steiner
EcommerceBytes.com
July 29, 2010




A court has set aside a default judgment against eBay in a lawsuit over the company's alleged practice of forcing sellers to use PayPal. The lawsuit was filed in Michigan on April 12, 2010, in Michigan, and the Court had held eBay in default after it failed to respond. This week, the court set aside the default judgement and gave eBay time to respond to the lawsuit.

In doing so, the Court said that plaintiffs had mailed eBay the summons and complaint by certified mail, return receipt requested addressed to Defendants' "Corporate Counsel," and that they failed to attempt to serve eBay by any other method, including service upon eBay's or PayPal's respective agents - although the plaintiffs pointed out that in attempting to find eBay's registered agent in Michigan, they found that eBay's registered agent had withdrawn from duty.

The Court addressed the issues raised under a rule that provides that an entry of default may be set aside for "good cause." To determine whether good cause has been shown, the court must consider "whether (1) the default was willful, (2) set aside would prejudice plaintiff, and (3) the alleged defense is meritorious."

Federal policy strongly favors allowing parties to resolve their disputes at trial rather than by default, and the Court said the defendant's default was not willful; it also said that setting aside the defaults would not prejudice the plaintiffs.

The court also used eBay's argument that it had a meritorious defense to the plaintiffs' complaint, arguing that the plaintiffs' claims in this lawsuit were nearly identical to antitrust claims that had been dismissed in a federal case in the Northern District of California (see information about that case in this March 05, 2010, AuctionBytes article).

The attorney representing the plaintiffs told the Detroit News he had offered to settle the lawsuit without any monetary payments if eBay would change its policy and allow use of payment methods other than PayPal.

While eBay does not technically require sellers to accept PayPal in the U.S., eBay.com bans sellers from soliciting payments by checks and money orders. eBay.com allows sellers to accept credit cards through merchant accounts, which are not feasible for small sellers. eBay.com also allows sellers to offer two international payment services, both with low adoption rates by eBay shoppers in the U.S.

You may quote up to 50 words of any article on the condition that you attribute the article to EcommerceBytes.com and either link to the original article or to www.EcommerceBytes.com.
All other use is prohibited.

Email Newsletter icon, E-mail Newsletter icon, Email List icon, E-mail List icon Sign up for our Email Newsletters

Email this story to a friend.

Previous | | Next

 EcommerceBytes Blog 
 AuctionBytes Blog 
 Letters to the Editor 
Related Stories 
Related Stories
  • Hagens Berman Sues eBay's Bill Me Later for Allegedly Violating Consumer Rights - January 07, 2010, Issue #2196
  • Paris Court Rules Against eBay, Orders It to Pay 200,000 Euros to LVM - February 12, 2010, Issue #2222
  • Judge Rules against eBay Sellers in Antitrust Lawsuit - March 05, 2010, Issue #2237
  • Tiffany May Take eBay Counterfeit Battle to Supreme Court - April 02, 2010, Issue #2257
  • Firm Files Class Action Lawsuit against eBay for PayPal Holds - June 08, 2010, Issue #2304
  • Court Expected to Rule Soon in eBay v Craigslist - June 28, 2010, Issue #2318
  • Firm to Seek Racketeering Charges in eBay Live Auctions Lawsuit - July 07, 2010, Issue #2325
  • eBay Hit with $3.8 Billion Lawsuit over Patent Claim - July 14, 2010, Issue #2325
  • Appeal Filed in eBay Discrimination Lawsuit - July 22, 2010, Issue #2331
  • Appeals Court to Hear Oral Arguments in eBay Discrimination Lawsuit - July 29, 2010, Issue #2336
  • Court to Set Aside Judgment against eBay in 'PayPal-only' Lawsuit - July 29, 2010, Issue #2336
  • Italian Court Orders eBay to Reinstate Seller - August 04, 2010, Issue #2340
  • eBay, Skype, IDT and Net2Phone Settle Patent Dispute - August 06, 2010, Issue #2342
  • eBay's Top Affiliates Indicted for Fraud - August 11, 2010, Issue #2345
  • French Court Reduces eBay Fines in Counterfeits Ruling - September 03, 2010, Issue #2362
  • Delaware Court Issues Split Decision in eBay v Craigslist - September 09, 2010, Issue #2366
  • Court Says eBay Took Steps to Prevent Tiffany Counterfeits - September 13, 2010, Issue #2368
  • eBay Sellers Win Class Action Status in Auction-Duration Lawsuit - October 04, 2010, Issue #2383
  • Apple Sues eBay's Largest Seller eForcity over Alleged Knockoffs - October 19, 2010, Issue #2394
  • Knockoffs on eBay - Supreme Court Denies Tiffany's Petition - November 30, 2010, Issue #2424
  • eBay Sellers File Antitrust Lawsuit over Feedback Policy - December 23, 2010, Issue #2441
  • The Sellers Behind eBay's Antitrust Lawsuit - December 23, 2010, Issue #2441
  • eBay Settles Class Action Lawsuit for $30 Million - January 13, 2011, Issue #2456
  • eBay Sellers Lose Appeal in Antitrust Lawsuit - May 11, 2011, Issue #2540


  • Discussion Forums 
    Have a question about buying or selling online? Want to get marketing or technical advice? AuctionBytes Discussion Forums are the place to come to get answers to your questions and get advice! Great tips - a refreshing change!

    Current Discussions:
     

    About Us      Privacy Policy      Link to Us      Partners      Our Writers      Write for Us      Press        Site Index

    Copyright 1999-. Steiner Associates LLC. All rights reserved.